I’m baffled. Honestly. As a non-military or
spook-person, I don’t understand
the latest claims that nearly half those in the IRA leadership were in fact British agents. We know
that some IRA people – the various supergrasses, Denis Donaldson – were working
for the British from within republican paramilitary ranks. But nearly half?
My first bafflement is, how all those agents must have been
central to all the things the IRA did
- shootings, explosions, killings. If they'd kept coming up with excuses for being elsewhere each time violence was planned or occurred, wouldn’t somebody
have smelt a rat? And if they were directly involved, wouldn’t that have placed them in Alice in Wonderland? In order to bring
an end to the IRA’s violent actions, they were…um…performing violent IRA
actions. Or master-minding them. Or both. Am I missing something here?
The second bafflement is, how on earth was the IRA so
successful for so long? As a paramilitary force, it was acknowledged as one of
the most effective in the world – very often by people who detested it. But how
in God’s name could a force like that have so many of its leading figures British agents? Imagine if half the British forces that
sailed to the Falklands had been in fact Argentine agents. Is it likely that
Thatcher would have been able to arrange the sinking of The Belgrano without
interference? Wouldn’t the British forces have been hopelessly confused, with
all those agents in their ranks?
My third bafflement relates to cui bono - who gains from this kind of claim? Certainly not
republicans – it undermines what they would present as a heroic campaign against the British forces that went on for decades. If this heroism could be transformed into instead a pack of fools continually deceived by their shrewd
British enemies, think what a wonderfully demoralizing effect that might have
on republican energies and ambitions today?
If you can pollute the waters in which your enemy swims, you’ve
got him licked. But you have to be sure that what you’re pouring into those waters is
concentrated, 100% garbage.
I have heard many's a tale ? but who really benefits from discrediting Sinn Féin ?
ReplyDelete"The second bafflement is, how on earth was the IRA sosuccessful for so long?"
ReplyDeleteWhat if the whole thing was State sponsored on both sides (loyalist and republican)? ie run by the british gov, in part, for some nefarious reason some ghoulish experiment?
to what end? surely they could have flicked a switch if they wanted to?
What if the whole thing was to set in motion a political process to get rid of a lump of land they didnt want?
I love a good conspiracy.
Ryan
If it's factual, then surely those running the agents kept the war running for longer than it needed to and are, therefore, culpable for the deaths, damage which they were allowing if not actually encouraging to happen. I remember reading somewhere that The BA used to bring officers from other countries over to go on foot patrols etc. as part of the insurgency training they were providing for all those great democracies, like Libya, Pinochet's Chile, Syria and the like. So perhaps that's why the pot was kept boiling, so to speak, if created a nice little earner for the MOD.
ReplyDeleteSo the special branch /MI5 were the brains behind the IRA UVF and UDA UDR and RUC? Could the real story be they ran/run journalists. BTY An bhfuil fáinne agat?
ReplyDeleteJust as baffeling are the unionist "agents", praised by "security" sources in numerous media as valuable and lifesavers, where's the evidence?. How many ambushes of unionist paramilitaries can be recalled? how many catholics were saved as the police surrounded armed men about to break their door down?. With so many "agents"what happened to all the house raids on the shankill?. Maybe im missing something, could it be that these charactors had a different role,one of prioritising murder rather than preventing.
ReplyDeleteAnon 10:59 - Tá fainne airgid agam...
ReplyDeleteMaith thú Jude
ReplyDeletePáid
members of other political parties may have been agents as well,surely it would have been just as valuable to have had members of the sdlp as agents,sure the never left police stations at the height of the war,and priests,enough said
ReplyDelete