Sunday, 16 October 2011

That Red C poll - makes you think, doesn't it?




OK -  guess which paper  today has the following headlines:

‘Michael D fears Sinn Féin in Aras would endorse IRA’

‘Uneasy riders who do not understand the Republic’

‘McGuinness plays victim in election he cannot win’

‘McGuinness finds that it is a long, long way from there to Down Here’

‘Miriam moment was when the mask slipped

‘Victims of Troubles haven’t gone away, you  know’

‘McGuinness shows no fear taking on ‘rotten-to-the-core’ civil service.’


All right, all right – today’s Sindo, of course, yes you were right but the thing is, why?  The day after a poll which shows McGuinness slipping three points to 13% and Gallagher surging a million points to 39%, leaving Higgins stumbling in his wake, why is the Sindo focusing on McGuinness?

Two possibilities: 

1.     The Sindo writers are a lazy shower who had their stuff written and ready before the Red C poll came out at tea-time yesterday, and they were so busy searching under the bed for a Provo from 1973 that they hadn’t either time or energy to change a word.
2.     They don’t believe a word in the Red C poll and are convinced that on 27 October,  the man threatening their darling M D Higgins will be not the bald chap who looks like he got a welt of a hurley stick  in the face at some point in the past, but Martin McGuinness.

A lot of people were surprised by yesterday’s poll, showing Gallagher at  39% , Higgins at  27% and McGuinness at  13%  . I was surprised myself. If you were to believe it  and the RTÉ commentators like the doe-eyed David McCullough, you’d  conclude that the field had finally thinned out to two candidates, Gallagher and Higgins, and all the rest were also-rans. Mmm. Could be right. But then I think of how the most-used word in the British press a few days’ back was ‘inevitable’, in describing the resignation of that good Catholic and seller of arms Liam Fox;  the previous day and week, none of the papers used the word ‘inevitable’ when speaking of Fox and resignation – only after the event.  The media, in Britain and Ireland, have a habit of drawing insightful conclusions in the wake of something having occurred. Before the event it’s, um, on the one hand, maybe, it looks like, who’s to say, I dunno, etc.  Now that the Red C poll has spoken, they’ll pile in to explain how they knew that all the time.

Maybe they’re right.  But I still remember listening to the car radio in 1970 and listening to an astonished Ted Heath comment on his totally unforeseen win in the general election; I remember Neil Kinnock shouting at a mass rally “We’re aaaallll rriiiiiighhhtt!!’ and then getting his arse whopped at the polls a few days later.  The Sindo, if you can bear to read it, will tell you that  63%  of people thought Miriam O’Callaghan did a good job on Wednesday night; those of us with ears and eyes know that Miriam HAS a  good job ( €300,000 + at last count) but most certainly did not DO a good job on Wednesday night, not if your criteria are balance and equal treatment. On the criterion of doing her damnedest to subvert McGuinness’s candidacy, she was great.  So yes,  the Red C poll says  there’s just Gallagher and Higgines left, but it was done before that infamous debate. A very persuasive medium, telly.

A final word: let’s leave McGuinness out of it for a moment, OK? That means the people of the south are poised to elect as president a man who was on TV in something called ‘Dragon’s Den’, who thinks skipping is a quality the Irish people value in their president, and who has been, all his adult life, an activist in the political party that nuked the Irish economy for decades to come.  Either that or they are poised to elect a tired-looking little man who has been a professional politician for the last 30 + years,  whose party (Labour) is currently doing in government what it swore it wouldn’t when running for office. In short, the Irish people of the south are poised to revert to the notion of the Aras as a rest-home for old politicians or they’re going to send a slightly odd-looking life-long activist from the political party that slashed and burnt the Irish economy to a near-terminal point.

Call me a cock-eyed optimist, but I can’t see the Irish people of the south being quite that  stupid. Can you?

10 comments:

  1. “Deputy Michael D. Higgins: Hamas is more advanced than the IRA.” 

    ReplyDelete
  2. The Sindo poll was taken before the Primetime debate.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Laughable article by Henry McDonald in the Observer according to the bold Henry Mr Gallaghers company is worth 10 Billion Euros.

    http://m.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/oct/15/sean-gallagher-ireland-president-election?cat=world&type=article

    ReplyDelete
  4. Oh Jude, dear Jude. Cork born and bred here. While I don't see the massive swing to Gallagher in the public, the electorate here can be that stupid.

    If Gallagher gets in to this race, then it will be a massive moral boost to the FF org. and I think will save them from extinction.

    ReplyDelete
  5. SF thought they had pulled a stroke by putting Martin McGuinness forward. But FF pulled the true masterstroke by getting Sean Gallagher the I Can't believe hes not FF candidate nominated.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Better Gallagher or Higgins or any of the others except McGuinness - a man with blood on his hands, a proven liar, and who is on the Army Council of the IRA ("they haven't gone away, you know").

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anon 16:45 -I'm very impressed by how much you know. Would you care to name your sources?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Southern electorate stupid? Wish they were. I'd have more respect for them. No, Jude, the Southern electorate are mice. They vote until they give their political masters and media spin doctors the result they want. They haven't the balls to vote for an Irish rebel.

    ReplyDelete
  9. You're a cock-eyed optimist Jude.

    ReplyDelete
  10. http://t.co/sPHiuhTX

    ReplyDelete