I’ve
been accused of having a thing for QE2, so to even mention the woman who makes
men walk backwards out of rooms is to invite criticism. But given the latest
Irish tourism figures, she has to be factored in.
Do
you remember those glorious days last May? When the people of the south of
Ireland queued up for the honour
of being near the British monarch? There were hard-headed people who objected
to that visit because, among other things, they thought that money spent on
banquets and massive security - €7
million, was it? - would have been better spent on hospitals or the lengthening
dole queues. The short-sightedness of these people was quickly corrected by
those in authority, when it was explained that her visit would give publicity
to the tourist industry that money simply could not buy. The millions spent
would be returned in increased tourist numbers, pressed down and running over.
Well,
the tourism figures for last year have just been released and yes, there has
indeed been a change in tourism figures. But according to The Irish Times yesterday, “visitors from Britain – Ireland’s biggest source
of overseas visitors – dropped by 2%”. During the first three months, before the south was graced by the
royal presence, the figures were stronger; the figures after she visited, in the latter part of the
year, showed a falling-off. Fewer, not more people came to Ireland. Where there were positive figures, the tourism people are attributing the
increase to the government’s reduction of VAT rather than the aroma left by the
royal presence. What’s more, a lot of criticism has been directed at the tourism people for focusing too much
on existing markets like Britain and not going after tourists from growing
economies like China and Brazil.
Since I have a thing for Her Majesty,
I’ve done what I can to see the numbers in a positive light but they stubbornly
resist. It very much looks like those days in May not only cost the southern
Irish taxpayer millions s/he could ill afford, but the pundits who went on
about reaping a royal harvest either lied or got it spectacularly wrong.
But
let’s be positive – let’s try to learn a lesson. A suggestion: this year, the
south’s government might want to offer the royal coffers say, €3 million, on
the promise no royal person will set foot on Irish soil in the coming year and
the hard-pressed tourism industry will be given a chance to get off its knees. Because
last time out, Her Majesty appears to have delivered tourism, not a boost, but a
regal boot in the face.
Jude
ReplyDeleteBetween 2009 and 2010 the no of overseas visits to Ireland dropped by more than 10%. Part of a trend in recent years.
If it's only 2% this year, then surely the Queen must be given some credit for helping to arrest the decline ?
God bless her.
It's not only thhe tourism industry that needs to get of it's knees. giordanobruno,the other 8% were out of RTE camera shot with their placards.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous
ReplyDeleteActually I see that RTE yesterday report that overseas visitor numbers increased by 6% last year.
A positive increase and by Jude's logic we can attribute a lot of it to her majesty.