To risk being pedantic: if no other good comes from the
supergrass trial that began in Belfast yesterday, at least the practice of
referring to informers as ‘informants’ will have been dropped. Or I hope
so. I don’t read all the papers but those I do, if they have
to use the i word, it's been ‘informer’. Why was ‘informant’ ever used? Because
‘informer’ has resonances that ripple back through Irish history and the
authorities didn’t want it to trigger the contempt it did.
You could argue it’s not fair or even law-abiding to
experience such contempt. The fact is, the testimony that Robert and David
Stewart give in the Laganside court in the coming days may result in the imprisonment of a number of highly
dangerous men. The brothers
Stewart in 2008 walked into Antrim police station and admitted to being UVF
members. By confessing to their own crimes - around seventy – and by detailing the part played by
others, they have managed to get their jail terms shrunk to two or three years
rather than two or three decades.
There have been lots of public protest that we’re back to the
supergrass trials of the 1980s which led to the arrest of dozens of IRA men but
which collapsed when the word of the supergrasses was declared unreliable. The
authorities claim that the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act of 2005 is a
totally different animal but not many people believe them. A supergrass trial is a
supergrass trial, just as an informer is an informer.
But while there’s little doubt that the majority of
people would like to see murderous members of the UVF safely behind bars, they feel an uneasiness that it's being done in this way. There’s something shameful
about men who swear their allegiance to an organization, however detestable
that organization, then turn on its members to save their own skin.
That’s what the two Stewarts look like they’re doing.
Even most nationalists and republicans will have reservations about any convictions secured under these terms. But there’s one
other, um, concern shall we say, that nationalists and republicans have as they
watch this trial unfold. We know that loyalist
murder gangs were threaded with those who acted under instructions from their
police handlers, sometimes to commit murder. If there's going to be a trial, shouldn’t some of the men who
pulled the strings be in the dock as well?
According to Chris Moore, Mark Haddock was paid at least £79,000 by his RUC Special Branch and CID handlers.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.thedetail.tv/columns/analysis/protected-species